• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Dodge, Jeep and RAM Forum dedicated to FCA owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the SRT Forum today!


Lip on rotors

Unholy707

8000 Posts Club
9 Second Best E/T
HFCOTM
Member ID
#11903
Messages
8,473
Reactions
7,384
Likes
402
City
Orlando
State
FL
Country
United States
Vehicle
2015 Dodge Challenger Hellcat
#1
Front rotors have developed a pretty deep lip. More on the inside of the rotor than the outside. Can they be turned down? What is the spec? I have calipers, I'll measure thickness with lip, how deep the lip is, and then subtract the lip. Is this the correct procedure to get the thickness? Does anyone have the spec so I can tell if they're able to be turned? Thanks
 


Member ID
#1482
Messages
112
Reactions
353
Likes
37
City
Somewhere
State
Non-US
Country
United States
Vehicle
Hellcat
#2
Front rotors have developed a pretty deep lip. More on the inside of the rotor than the outside. Can they be turned down? What is the spec? I have calipers, I'll measure thickness with lip, how deep the lip is, and then subtract the lip. Is this the correct procedure to get the thickness? Does anyone have the spec so I can tell if they're able to be turned? Thanks
For the Dodge Hellcat (Challenger/Charger SRT Hellcat) front rotors,
34 mm nominal thickness
32 mm minimum service thickness

OEM Pad Thickness
Front Pads:
Brembo P37018 (15mm thick, 93mm height) Semi-Metallic, Performance
Brembo P37018N (16mm thick, 93mm height) Ceramic, Dust Reduction, Non-Asbestos Organic (NOA)

Rear Pads:
Brembo P11024 (15mm thick, 69mm height) Semi-Metallic, Performance
Brembo P11024N (15mm thick, 69mm height) Ceramic, Dust Reduction, Non-Asbestos Organic (NOA)
 


MikeD1

4000 Posts Club
Founding Member
Premium Account
HFCOTM
Member ID
#1026
Messages
4,665
Reactions
18,805
Likes
302
City
Central Florida
State
FL
Country
United States
Vehicle
2016 Challenger Hellcat
HFCOTM
View Images
#3
I vaguely recall reading somewhere that Dodge recommended against turning these rotors (2 mm is not much to play with) - but I could be wrong.
@BULL any thoughts?
 


BULL

Oh NO! Not that guy!
Staff Team
Founding Member
U.S. Marine Veteran
Donating Member
HFCOTM
Wiki Contributor
Member ID
#1079
Messages
16,749
Reactions
52,437
Likes
402
City
Weld County
State
CO
Country
United States
Vehicle
MY16 M6 Challenger Hellcat
HFCOTM
View Images
#4
I vaguely recall reading somewhere that Dodge recommended against turning these rotors (2 mm is not much to play with) - but I could be wrong.
@BULL any thoughts?

Turning is ok in my mind, IF you can find a shop both willing and able to successfully do it.

You need a knowledgeable tech, sharp tools, and hat hardware in good shape to prevent chatter.

(if the ring isn't securely attached to the hat, it's going to chatter, unfortunately rings that need to be turned tend to go hand in hand with degraded hat hardware.)

The good news is that hat hardware is now available and can be replaced, unlike in the past where it essentially wasn't available.
 


BULL

Oh NO! Not that guy!
Staff Team
Founding Member
U.S. Marine Veteran
Donating Member
HFCOTM
Wiki Contributor
Member ID
#1079
Messages
16,749
Reactions
52,437
Likes
402
City
Weld County
State
CO
Country
United States
Vehicle
MY16 M6 Challenger Hellcat
HFCOTM
View Images
#5
Also, understand that even if you're at say something like 32.5mm (.5mm over min), there may not be enough to turn without going under the 32mm min.

And a bit about rotor min thickness, which I didn't learn until not all that long ago...

The FIRST reason that this is a concern ISN'T rotor thermal mass capacity (although that IS a secondary issue), the first reason is the caliper pistons are designed for a maximum extension.

So you have to consider min rotor thickness, AND min pad thickness, resulting in a maximum piston extension from the piston bore.

Further with our rigid calipers, this is further compounded if there is an asymmetry in either and/or the rotor and pads, unlike a floating caliper that can tend to find center of the system.
 


Member ID
#1482
Messages
112
Reactions
353
Likes
37
City
Somewhere
State
Non-US
Country
United States
Vehicle
Hellcat
#6
Also, understand that even if you're at say something like 32.5mm (.5mm over min), there may not be enough to turn without going under the 32mm min.

And a bit about rotor min thickness, which I didn't learn until not all that long ago...

The FIRST reason that this is a concern ISN'T rotor thermal mass capacity (although that IS a secondary issue), the first reason is the caliper pistons are designed for a maximum extension.

So you have to consider min rotor thickness, AND min pad thickness, resulting in a maximum piston extension from the piston bore.

Further with our rigid calipers, this is further compounded if there is an asymmetry in either and/or the rotor and pads, unlike a floating caliper that can tend to find center of the system.
To that point:

For 6-piston Brembo front calipers (as used on SRT/Hellcat/Redeye/Demon), the maximum safe piston extension is about 8–9 mm. Anything beyond 10 mm is considered unsafe.

Three piston pairs
Usable/normal travel: 4–6 mm
Maximum safe travel: ≈8–9 mm
Absolute danger zone: ≥10 mm

Absolute rotor minimum: 32 mm
Caliper-travel-based pad minimum (rotor at 32 mm):
  • ~7 mm friction for P37018 (starts at 15mm)
  • ~8 mm friction for P37018N (starts at 16mm)
 


Last edited:


Top